HAMP: Not one trial loan modification has been made permanent!

The numbers are simply unbelievable! 651,000 trial modifcations and not ONE has been made permanent under Obama’s HAMP! Somebody needs to bring the hammer down on these banks. Is Obama not up to the task? The time for coddling Wall Street and banks is over. Geezus H!

“We are taking additional steps to enhance servicer transparency and accountability as part of a broader focus on maximizing conversion rates to permanent modifications,” Treasury spokeswoman Meg Reilly said in an e-mail. The Obama administration plans to announce additional steps today, including new private-public partnerships and resources for borrowers.

Distressed homeowners turn to torture to blow off a little steam.

Wow!  There are “distressed” homeowners and then there are “DISTRESSED!*# homeowners!

Read more here

Weston, 52, and Parmelee, 51, both arrested last week and jailed on $1 million bond, shared a house in the suburb of La Canada-Flintridge that is in foreclosure, authorities said.

“The two allegedly sought loan modification assistance from the victims but believed that nothing was being done and wanted their money back,” a statement from the district attorney’s office said.

Government loan modification numbers may be bogus.

I help clients with their  loan modifications,  so when I heard the news a few weeks back that banks have helped 500,000 homeowners modify their loans I was skeptical.  I was skeptical because the loan modification process takes a while, on average about 90 days.  So considering that the roll out of the HAMP program was earlier this year, and given the fact that lenders complain they are understaffed to handle the volume of modification requests it would be damn near physically impossible to do that many loan modifications in just a few months. But what do I know?

Here’s another guy that wonders aloud…

Mortgage expert

and one-time Fannie Mae Chief Credit Officer Edward Pinto blasts the claim that 500,000 homeowners have entered into HAMP (Home Affordable Modification Program).

Based on comments being made by industry participants and program results to date, HAMP is rapidly becoming: I will pretend to modify your loan if you pretend that you will make the payments.

On October 9 Treasury Secretary Geithner announced that the Obama administration’s HAMP had enrolled its 500,000 participant.

However, only about 1200 borrowers have entered the permanent modification phase; with the balance being in the 3-5 month trial period.  This is in spite of the fact that there were 200,000 trials in progress back in July.

The reason for this snail like progress is, in an effort to reach its previously announced target of 500,000 modifications by November 1, program documentation guidelines were loosened.  According to Michael Young, vice chairman of the Mortgage Bankers Association, 99% of the loan modification packages are incomplete.  This has led to speculation that many of the 500,000 will never submit the necessary documentation or will not qualify.

Also of concern is the expected dropout of a sizable number of qualified borrowers who fail to make all the payments required during the trial period.

This fear has been heightened by the concern of some servicers that borrowers will use the trial period to game the foreclosure process and delay their own foreclosures by another 5 or 6 months.

Finally, in an effort to get more modifications approved, unemployment compensation will be counted (see attachment).

The number of permanent modifications resulting from these 500,000 trial modifications could be low as 100,000-200,000. Finally, at a 50% ultimate redefault failure rate, only 50,000-100,000 performing loans will result.  At this success rate, it is mathematically impossible for the administration to meet its announced goal of keeping 3 to 4 million Americans in their homes by preventing avoidable foreclosures with loan modifications .  To do so would require putting 15 -30 million loans into trial modifications to reach the stated goal.

Meanwhile, the DOL’s announcement about counting unemployment benefits as income is here.

// <![CDATA[//

Thinking about doing your own loan modification?

Everyday I speak with homeowners that have gone the do-it-yourself  route when attempting a loan workout with their lenders. Most have given up in frustration and the few that have “succeeded” ended up with little if any “modification” of their mortgages. In some cases payments actually increased.

If you are seriously thinking about doing your own loan modification ask yourself if you’ll have the patience…let alone the cold blooded detachment and expertise to deal with the sharks at your lender.

sharks

Watch as Congresswoman Maxine Waters tries her hand at a loan modification.

“The average American trying to negotiate a loan modification will not be able to get it done,” said Waters. “It will be impossible for them to get in touch with the right person, and even if they get in touch with a so-called counselor, they have a cookie cutter kind of direction that they go in.”

Bank of America fails to honor loan modification agreement.

More BS from a TARP recipient

According to a copy of the lawsuit, the Floreas have been paying their mortgage loan in the amount that complies with the terms of a written loan modification offered by Countrywide Home Loans. The Floreas signed the loan modification Jan. 10, 2009, and sent it back to Countrywide via FedEx, the lawsuit said.

Bank of America announced the finalization of its purchase of Countrywide Home Loans in January 2009.

When Bank of America acquired Countrywide, it became legally obligated to honor Countrywide’s loan modifications, Lawson said.

The Floreas’ modified mortgage payment was $584 per month. In late June 2009, the Bank of America sent a statement to the Floreas indicating their monthly mortgage payment is $924 — the initial mortgage payment amount, Legal Aid Society lawyers wrote.

The Bank of America correspondence to the Floreas also indicated they had a past due balance of $11,083 on their account.

According to the Floreas’ lawyers, Mrs. Florea made several calls to Bank of America and each person said the Floreas’ loan modification was still being processed. In late July, Mrs. Florea was told by phone that the Bank of America would initiate foreclosure proceedings if she and her husband did not pay the past due balance and resume monthly payments of $924.

On Aug. 24, 2009, Mrs. Florea tried to make a payment by phone but was refused and told there was a hold on her account because she is delinquent, wrote Legal Aid Society lawyers. She spoke with several people who said her loan modification was not processed because the income information was inconsistent, said the Legal Aid Society.

According to the lawsuit, Bank of America has reported negative activity on the Floreas’ account to the credit bureaus since at least March 2009.

snip

Lawson said the allegations in the suit against Bank of America contrast with what many banks have said regarding their modification of mortgage loan terms as a way to help alleviate the foreclosure crisis.

“Now here’s a bank where after already giving a homeowner loan modification, they turn around and say we’re not honoring this after all. You owe us thousands of dollars and if you don’t pay us, we’re going to take your home from you. So, it just runs counter to everything that most of the banks are saying out there right now,” Lawson said.

The Legal Aid Society of Southwest Ohio also has filed a similar lawsuit against Bank of America on behalf of a Hamilton County woman who has resided in her home for 18 years.

Are you a candidate for a loan modification?

You are a candidate for a loan modification if you can document and prove  to your lender that you have suffered a hardship that has effected your ability to make your mortgage payments in a timely manner.  An example of a hardship would be a loss of income to due to job loss, illness or injury.

Loan modifications a can be frustratingly tricky as each lender may have different guidelines. From a lender’s perspective they are most concerned with your ability to repay the loan once they have agreed to modify the terms of your mortgage note and therefore will look at your income to determine whether they will offer to modify. If you have too much income or too little income the bank will be reluctant to modify the note.  However, unlike qualifying for mortgage financing, a lender will consider total household income as long as a homeowner can document said income. This could include income from part-time employment, social security, and rent from someone staying in your home.

What is a loan modification?

A loan modification is an agreement between a lender and a borrower that changes the original terms of a loan with the goal of making house payments more affordable.

Loan modifications can be accomplished in a variety of ways:

  • The interest rate on a loan can be temporarily lowered.
  • The interest rate can be permanently changed at a lower fixed rate.
  • An adjustable rate could be changed to a fixed rate.
  • The term of the loan could be changed from 30 years to 40 years.
  • A principal reduction of the loan amount (rare)
  • A combination of all of the above.

Loan modifications push payments higher

Read about it here

Tens of thousands of financially strapped homeowners who have asked lenders to lower their mortgage payments are instead winding up with higher monthly payments and larger debts on their homes.

Homeowners who were hoping for lower payments are discovering to their dismay that lenders roll late fees, back taxes or other costs into the principal, sometimes turning a difficult payment into an impossible one. That is one reason that many reworked mortgages are sliding back into default.

More on loan modifications

The claims in the article I lined to below confirm what I hear anectdotally…which is that very few loan mods get done…and those loans that are modified don’t have a very high success rate.That’s not to say loan modifications in some form couldn’t work…but for a loan mod to be successful it would have to include some sort of debt relief for the homeowner…which seems unlikely to happen in my lifetime (greed).

I’ve said it before…I’ll say it again…once the financial market’s dust settles…look for lenders to start foreclosing with a vengeance…

Read what the Economist has to say on the topic

It is a compelling argument, but apparently not an accurate one. A new study* by a trio of Federal Reserve economists finds that very few delinquent mortgages are modified overall, and that securitised loans are as likely to be renegotiated as those on lenders’ books.

The economists looked at a sample of mortgages in a huge data set that covers 60% of America’s residential-mortgage market. Less than 3% of seriously delinquent borrowers got a mortgage modification that reduced their monthly payments in the year after they got into trouble. Less than 8% of them got any kind of modification at all. Differences between securitised mortgages and others were scant. Lenders of all stripes clearly prefer to foreclose on delinquent borrowers. Repossession proceedings were begun in half the cases and completed in one-third of them.

Speaking of loan mods…

Yesterday I mentioned that loan mods were the new dark underbelly of the real estate industry. If you don’t know…many failed loan officers and real estate agents have turned to loan mods to generate income…some really do try to provide a valuable service (but at a fairly high price). Others are involved in complete scams…

Now we have this from the FBI about loan mods….(and mortgage fraud in general)

Foreclosure Rescue – Loan Modification Program Schemes

Loan modification schemes, typically in the form or an advance-fee/foreclosure rescue scheme, are emerging as recent vulnerabilities in HERA and EESA legislation (see second text box) becomes apparent. Lenders are mandated by recent legislation to work with homeowners to assist them in keeping their homes out of foreclosure; however, individuals are perpetrating advance-fee schemes to generate income from victim homeowners. Perpetrators solicit homeowners with mail flyers offering to help them stop the foreclosure process on their homes. Homeowners are falsely told that their mortgages would be renegotiated, their monthly payments would be reduced, and delinquent loan amounts would be renegotiated to the principle. Perpetrators require an up-front fee ranging from $1,500 to $5,000 from homeowners to participate in the loan-modification program. Perpetrators often request that the victim homeowners stop payments and communication with their lender. When victims receive delinquency and foreclosure notices, the perpetrators convince them that the loan was renegotiated, but that the lender needs a good faith payment to secure the new account.